spudgun

For all users, who don't speak German!

Moderator: Forum-Team

Re: spudgun

Beitragvon Chactory » 1. Sep 2013, 22:40

godmcgarvey hat geschrieben:... even some I send to myself. ... Outlook doesn't show this additional info and displays the subject and sender correctly, MailWasher ...

Sorry, I'm floundering more and more, but could it depend on the additional software on your computer, beeing not compatible with Spamihilator? E.g. Mailwasher?
HilfeHelp «en»TippsAnbuva's FAQBob's FAQ «en»SpamwortlisteRegelfilterScreenshotsSSL/TLSSpami 1.6.0
Vostro 3450, Intel Core i5 2410M 2,3 GHz, 4 GB DDR3 SDRAM 1333 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64 Bit SP1

Bild
Benutzeravatar
Chactory
Administrator
Administrator
 
Administration
Beta-Tester
Forum-Team
 
Beiträge: 9593
Registriert: 9. Jan 2004, 23:19
Wohnort: Kiel (D)

Re: spudgun

Beitragvon godmcgarvey » 2. Sep 2013, 19:25

Seems I am not alone with this problem and its not specific to Spamihilator but does appear to be to do with the X-CTCH addition to the header

http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/47286-email-content-showing-html-source-code-subject-and-sender-not-visible/
godmcgarvey
Power-User
Power-User
 
Beiträge: 12
Registriert: 25. Aug 2013, 12:20

Re: spudgun

Beitragvon Chactory » 2. Sep 2013, 21:48

Hello!

Thank you very much for provoding this notable hyperlink to a similar discussion! If you want to do that, it could be of interest to have a mail-sourcecode published in code-brackets. Before that you should replace personal data by xxx, of course. TIA.

Kind regards,
Chactory
HilfeHelp «en»TippsAnbuva's FAQBob's FAQ «en»SpamwortlisteRegelfilterScreenshotsSSL/TLSSpami 1.6.0
Vostro 3450, Intel Core i5 2410M 2,3 GHz, 4 GB DDR3 SDRAM 1333 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64 Bit SP1

Bild
Benutzeravatar
Chactory
Administrator
Administrator
 
Administration
Beta-Tester
Forum-Team
 
Beiträge: 9593
Registriert: 9. Jan 2004, 23:19
Wohnort: Kiel (D)

Re: spudgun

Beitragvon godmcgarvey » 3. Sep 2013, 20:54

Received-SPF: none (smtpin31.bt.ext.cpcloud.co.uk: domain btinternet.com does
not designate permitted sender hosts):
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090201.52263D79.0017,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0
X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
Received: from nm3.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (212.82.108.234) by smtpin31.bt.ext.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.100.06)
id 521F9D0201712139 for myadress@myisp.com; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 20:50:17 +0100
Received: from [212.82.108.229] by nm3.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2013 19:50:16 -0000
Received: from [46.228.39.171] by tm2.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2013 19:50:16 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp112.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Sep 2013 19:50:16 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1378237816; bh=03uU7GvJ6AJYpLGFlyKypua7z8OmvoAycMqRJDfAQC4=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=GqnVS66Ny8TFEIO3MFWCcZtI4ZXke1GogtHEqA8ysiAs370bU3ikRO4UhtS8ux8+QJfivHZ9KVGfRfLAXjqx4r1uUG/Yl+7DccEDmQF+ZTztLaSJnLqSbmnp2/Dmn7aSC8hKhf8xer5xljbIdsamzwmkwoXmaYdaKT8iPgcU+rc=
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 705955.72574.bm@smtp112.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: UBxL6DkVM1ldPYIrJ_QAUGzKARE3dT5CltNAk1j5.lAX281
JSG3yr4uVAWFYm_dEFg_kopkAbIsIH5NsSVo7mu0_kQDqnqKBPBSJFKT472d
DukRRUfGJg8212ojc4TVm8MduxlTVNuPSeZ2wmZNprUo7mmt4WCPS5iCo5P2
.j_GyKmJxlPYblhhCmb.bSY2aX.RmQ5NhioztkHz2tAPVh56Wt05tmvmo20A
Zn94GVLmgVhSPLgNKQO9nEJht976vQ7VzOqeDcMhBqjx44Uiz9XbVlK0eomx
_O_lSFFYKXNQBcOGb__uLy4ZJ72EidK9Eq8zNW_T72HsPvWGjKvTbNZXQFEC
aipVRcvFGpTULo_leINPPKKYuIHmPXoRAJPMh4nqWJDnhlgVC0wsdF9691mx
AD9xI1e7r.u3IF6SQmjte6qaIMCv7Nn2zgD_Si1bdjQAr06UHQCpOM8FB4Y0
VG6wwQJ48FVjQuQQdANPAX6wDmiaxx3IrhUXjieSBUwO.1zN1UW.Yt4av5FJ
9AgXUo4kTlhH0aPpdQOQQN7h.qLQR
X-Yahoo-SMTP: ZG1FZZiswBCAXOHCC4JptX.uO1_194aGcFdYPhw81raSFC3uzWZuYj8o
From: "Me" <myadress@myisp.com>
To: "'Me'" <myadress@myisp.com>
Subject: test3
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 20:50:13 +0100
Message-ID: <000d01cea8de$cefa4f80$6ceeee80$@wateridge@btinternet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000E_01CEA8E7.30BEB780"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac6o3s4qTmUa+5O/SvWDquwesutmWg==
Content-Language: en-gb

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000E_01CEA8E7.30BEB780
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

test


------=_NextPart_000_000E_01CEA8E7.30BEB780
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 12 =
(filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
..MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=3DEN-GB link=3Dblue =
vlink=3Dpurple><div class=3DWordSection1><p =
class=3DMsoNormal>test<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>
------=_NextPart_000_000E_01CEA8E7.30BEB780--
godmcgarvey
Power-User
Power-User
 
Beiträge: 12
Registriert: 25. Aug 2013, 12:20

Re: spudgun

Beitragvon Chactory » 6. Sep 2013, 23:43

Thank you very much for that. :)
Odd! I don't understand why Spamihilator shouldn't display those mails correctly ...
HilfeHelp «en»TippsAnbuva's FAQBob's FAQ «en»SpamwortlisteRegelfilterScreenshotsSSL/TLSSpami 1.6.0
Vostro 3450, Intel Core i5 2410M 2,3 GHz, 4 GB DDR3 SDRAM 1333 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64 Bit SP1

Bild
Benutzeravatar
Chactory
Administrator
Administrator
 
Administration
Beta-Tester
Forum-Team
 
Beiträge: 9593
Registriert: 9. Jan 2004, 23:19
Wohnort: Kiel (D)

Re: spudgun

Beitragvon godmcgarvey » 9. Sep 2013, 20:56

Appears that during the summer BT changed from using Yahoo as its mail to a company called Critical Path

It appears to be something they are doing that is causing the problem for me and others

http://www.cp.net/
godmcgarvey
Power-User
Power-User
 
Beiträge: 12
Registriert: 25. Aug 2013, 12:20


Re: spudgun

Beitragvon Chactory » 9. Sep 2013, 21:31

Thank you again. :) I have tried to understand the source code you provided above, but I can't find anything within, which could disturb Spamihilator. I suppose, this problem will end soon, but it annoys me that I can't understand it ...
HilfeHelp «en»TippsAnbuva's FAQBob's FAQ «en»SpamwortlisteRegelfilterScreenshotsSSL/TLSSpami 1.6.0
Vostro 3450, Intel Core i5 2410M 2,3 GHz, 4 GB DDR3 SDRAM 1333 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64 Bit SP1

Bild
Benutzeravatar
Chactory
Administrator
Administrator
 
Administration
Beta-Tester
Forum-Team
 
Beiträge: 9593
Registriert: 9. Jan 2004, 23:19
Wohnort: Kiel (D)

Re: spudgun

Beitragvon godmcgarvey » 25. Sep 2013, 21:01

Good news

It appears that whatever BT/Critical Path where doing they have stopped now.

I have been running Spamihilator for the last 3 days and all mails have been displayed properly. No unusual additions to the headers.

I have also tried many self tests (sending mails to myself) and these previously only had a 70% chance of displaying correctly. They are now 100% okay.

Fingers crossed!
godmcgarvey
Power-User
Power-User
 
Beiträge: 12
Registriert: 25. Aug 2013, 12:20

Re: spudgun

Beitragvon Chactory » 26. Sep 2013, 23:00

Thank you for giving a feedback about the positive changes! :)
godmcgarvey hat geschrieben:Fingers crossed!
Hopefully! ;)
HilfeHelp «en»TippsAnbuva's FAQBob's FAQ «en»SpamwortlisteRegelfilterScreenshotsSSL/TLSSpami 1.6.0
Vostro 3450, Intel Core i5 2410M 2,3 GHz, 4 GB DDR3 SDRAM 1333 MHz, Windows 7 Pro 64 Bit SP1

Bild
Benutzeravatar
Chactory
Administrator
Administrator
 
Administration
Beta-Tester
Forum-Team
 
Beiträge: 9593
Registriert: 9. Jan 2004, 23:19
Wohnort: Kiel (D)

Vorherige

Zurück zu English Forum

Wer ist online?

Mitglieder in diesem Forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] und 4 Gäste

 industrious-southeast